From general-return-8191-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Mar 08 16:51:53 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56215 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 16:51:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 16:51:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 61532 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 16:50:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61283 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 16:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61207 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 16:50:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:50:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of tomdzk@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.192] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:50:45 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so114196uge for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:50:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tK9LDLYujgzUWHd1TYpKyB1HaEFIdMd3Uh7xmqYvO9kfYMUNsXhJz1SYpdJPRYhjeLiDPZ5sV9kA5+q/XkrWery2KHKicQb/han2HSkOqYGQzm/COUclL+PcF02GRwbTc5XA/gPS99dZNZ3CbhrlPK4qXwHBZXEx368IrLn3zWY= Received: by 10.66.237.19 with SMTP id k19mr365565ugh; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:50:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.30.2 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:50:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <224f32340603080850p239fe344u68ac00c36e33f37b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:50:24 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Open JPA Cc: pmc@db.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7920C18C-9164-44DD-BD6F-5B5DECECD31E@Sun.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7D856CDFE035FF45A0420ACBD71BDD6399151C@repbex02.amer.bea.com> <224f32340603080740t3d4e603ekd33e831197833d1d@mail.gmail.com> <7920C18C-9164-44DD-BD6F-5B5DECECD31E@Sun.COM> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, Craig L Russell wrote: > I think we might have a better chance at unifying these disparate > code bases if they are all in one place. And I think that DB might be > just the place. > > For the record, the Apache JDO project has no ORM engine. It has the > testing infrastructure for ORM and it has the JDO specification API, > but no implementation. So having a good JDO implementation is a > project (like your OBJ/EJB3 project) that hasn't begun, and we're > looking for a good base to start from. > > In particular, each of the persistence APIs has a front end (user > API), a back end (the actual object-to-SQL grind), integration (app > servers, web servers, Java SE), and tools. A hundred flowers have > bloomed and I'd like to see more synergy. > > That's why I like the idea of Cayenne in DB and would also like to > see OpenJPA in DB as well. Exactly my thoughts :-) Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org