incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <>
Subject Re: Preventing exclusionary practices in Incubating projects
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:42:24 GMT
On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <> wrote:
> Alan/James dredged up a thought process which i want to ask all of you
> about.
> For a concrete example, I know for a fact that WADI, ActiveIO and
> Trifork guys have been talking about coming up with a single framework
> for IO. James hinted in a prev message and there have been some
> references in emails on dev@geronimo list[1] and no traffic on
> activemq list (as far as i can tell)

Thats kinda the point - as up to now most of this code has not been part of
Geronimo and so wouldn't have been discussed on the Geronimo lists. Once all
the code has made it to the incubator, then we can start discussing this on
the Geronimo list but right now there have not been any discussions  and
AFAIK is no action plan - these things have so far only come to light when
meeting in person at ApacheCon & other conferences and realising that
there's lots of things we could do to consodiate code within the Geronimo
family of projects - once they are all at Geronimo. The incuabtion of
OpenEJB and WADI is progressing and we'll be able to tackle this soon - but
rest assured it will happen on the Geronimo lists.



  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message