incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs
Date Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:45:56 GMT
I'm not sure what is going on with that, I have commtted work to AMQ  
although it has been quite a while.

Why are you looking only at the branches?  And in particular why not  
include amq 4?

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:

> Hmmm...
>
> svn log svn://svn.activemq.org/activemq/scm/branches/activemq-3/ 
> activemq
> | grep "|" | cut -f 2 -d "|" | sort | uniq
>
> gives me just 15:
>
>  aco
>  ammulder
>  brianm
>  chirino
>  djcook
>  foconer
>  gnt
>  jgapuz
>  jlim
>  jstrachan
>  maguro
>  pbrooke
>  pvillacorta
>  rajdavies
>  rsaba
>
> -- dims
>
> On 3/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> IIUC, they all contributed code to the AMQ project.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> What i'd be interested to know is how many of the 17 Non-Apache
>>> Committers noted on the proposal[1] got Apache id's and of them how
>>> many of them actually made any commits to the Apache SVN repo.
>>>
>>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
>>>
>>> On 3/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@golux.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think I'm seeing too much incipient dogmatism here.  A little  
>>>>> while
>>>>> ago I remember reading about how it was possible for code to zip
>>>>> through the incubator on its way to become part of an existing
>>>>> project, resting only long enough for the legal/provenance  
>>>>> questions
>>>>> to be resolved.  I think this is still a good path to keep  
>>>>> open, and
>>>>> don't see the use of a PPMC for it.
>>>>>
>>>> Except ActiveMQ isn't just code, it's code+people.  If all
>>>> the people are already associated with the ASF when the
>>>> podling enters incubation..  well, then why isn't it being
>>>> handled as a grant of code?  The need for a podling implies
>>>> the presence of people new to the ASF.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> For instance, my understanding
>>>>> is that ActiveMQ is coming to be part of geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>> Most likely, yes -- but it's not a certainty.  (Just close to
>>>> it.)  The eventual disposition is made at graduation.
>>>> - --
>>>> #ken    P-)}
>>>>
>>>> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
>>>> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
>>>>
>>>> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>>>
>>>> iQCVAwUBRBbFR5rNPMCpn3XdAQKqOAQAtm4gWzEgdP9FZKknZWVbszAbIBafgvvn
>>>> 4wfPatOdUpy577axawHnFDq3i6OG3poPqYn7OecqZkCXSimSIf3Hp7CsijzHnL/x
>>>> rsluUCyPkW11/zs/lvlkXhpIWjNmpTV0T4EkiadZfIPK704qUE3CHpkKT0uYS7lk
>>>> xsA1obdLoes=
>>>> =3klG
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message