Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68543 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2006 17:33:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2006 17:33:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29313 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2006 17:33:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29170 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2006 17:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29159 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2006 17:33:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:33:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.2] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:33:51 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 3.0-dev) with SMTP ID 185 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:33:29 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: Incubator Roles revisited Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:33:26 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F81E8C.20000@wingsofhermes.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Lautenbach wrote: > I'd be happy for non-members who have met your criteria [with] > one caveat - I'd prefer to have at least one member on each > project to make sure there is someone in the podling that the > membership as a whole have agreed is looking out for the wider > interests of the ASF. Is this expressing concern that we would elect someone to the PMC who is more concerned about a specific podling, or a particular TLP, than the ASF? I suppose that is a fair concern, but doesn't that indicate whom should be elected to the PMC? Interstingly, when you look over the bullet lists associated with the role in http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html, you may notice that we have enumerated important oversight issues, but only one bullet even hints at the major responsibility of helping out with community building. And none talk about technical contributions. I feel that the former should be more explicit, but the latter is probably given as much emphasis (or lack thereof) as it deserves. Rich Bowen mentioned how he would like to be a Mentor, but doesn't know Java. Mentors need the ability to maintain the required oversight, and skill in community building. But I would rather have someone with those qualifications than someone skilled in the technical domain. A Mentor lacking the latter is likely to focus on community building, and helping the community to make its own decisions -- perhaps using the Socratic method -- rather than inserting himself or herself into the midst of technical issues. Helping the community to make collaborative decisions seems the right approach to me, especially with more and more sophisticated projects. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org