Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36761 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2006 16:21:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2006 16:21:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 55555 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2006 16:21:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55433 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2006 16:21:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55422 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2006 16:21:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:21:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jta@bristowhill.com designates 66.75.162.133 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.75.162.133] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:21:49 -0800 Received: from [192.168.15.53] (cpe-204-210-23-212.san.res.rr.com [204.210.23.212]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k19GLSXA026794 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43EB6C07.1050709@bristowhill.com> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:21:27 -0800 From: "Jean T. Anderson" Reply-To: jta@bristowhill.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [doc] podling software releases References: <43EABE49.3080109@bristowhill.com> <20060209085826.GD55679@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> In-Reply-To: <20060209085826.GD55679@bali.sjc.webweaving.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Leo Simons wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > ... > >>(2) Process details >> >>I'd like to modify this sentence: >> >>"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the >>Podling SHALL formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release." >> >>And incorporate specific details from >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/%3cC5C127EF-E3AB-4D72-A0B8-54FB51923A05@gbiv.com%3e >>: >> >>"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the >>Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling -dev list. If the majority of >>all votes is positive, then send a summary of that vote to >>general@incubator and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a >>release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required." > > ...and no -1 votes. In http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/%3cC5C127EF-E3AB-4D72-A0B8-54FB51923A05@gbiv.com%3e Roy wrote: > Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all > votes being positive. Releases do not need consensus. that suggests some votes could be negative, or perhaps I'm misunderstanding? >>Is this correct and adequate? > > +1 sounds good. Perhaps its good to incorporate by reference the HTTPD > release guidelines or similar. good suggestion. thanks, -jean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org