Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30365 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2006 19:05:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2006 19:05:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 72525 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2006 19:05:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72392 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2006 19:05:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72347 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2006 19:05:03 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:05:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.248.9] (HELO warspite.cnchost.com) (207.155.248.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:05:02 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by warspite.cnchost.com id OAA06339; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:04:38 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-ID: <43E8EEAF.3040004@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:02:07 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CCLA References: <43E8D7EB.2030006@toolazydogs.com> In-Reply-To: <43E8D7EB.2030006@toolazydogs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N You don't; that is - it's up to the iCLA signer to represent that they have the legal authority to sign the darned thing. A cCLA kicks in when 1) the -company- is granting code, on a continuing basis, and wants to make clear that all ongoing corporate-owned IP continues to be granted to the ASF for their granted code; and 2) when the -individual- decides they do not have the basis to sign the grant alone, as their work is for-hire or other law kicks in which grants their efforts to their employer. For example in California the work you do on your own time, on your own equipment, is yours. But in other jurisdictions, unless part of your employment contract, what you do in the evenings is the IP of your employer. It's up to the developer to know their employment contract and law with respect to the code that is their's to grant, and seek a cCLA when appropriate. So if you ask someone for an iCLA, and they state they can't, give them -also- the reference to the cCLA and have them approach their employer. Bill Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > The requirement for iCLAs is pretty straightforward. What is the rule > for requiring CCLAs? How do I, on the Apache side, perform due > diligence? Do I just point the candidates to the license page and ask > them to carefully read the material? > > > Regards, > Alan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > . > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org