Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <43E267BD.7040102@Golux.Com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:12:45 -0500
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com>
Reply-To: coar@apache.org
Organization: The Apache Software Foundation; Open Source Initiative
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why rewind? (Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation
 of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)
References: <19e0530f0602021036k74e1fb8fsd73e75cc904557be@mail.gmail.com>
 <B7586B03-B782-49BB-B15D-8BC96C0693BF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B7586B03-B782-49BB-B15D-8BC96C0693BF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

James Strachan wrote:
> 
> We were first voting to see if the servicemix community and geronimo  
> PMC were willing to accept the donation. Given it fits nicely with  
> the existing ServiceMix incubation proposal I see no need for a new  
> proposal for a donation of code to an existing incubating project.

I do, since accepting a donation without a lot more information
isn't appropriate.

>>- Which specific version of the spec is implemented?
>>- Where are the list of known issues?
>>- Where is the TODO list?
> 
> We were gonna update the status document of ServiceMix if folks voted  
> to accept it. We are still in incubation
	:
>>- Is there no opportunity for interaction with our Existing incubation
>>project Agila?
> 
> We'll see - lets first vote to accept the patch then let the  
> community decide those things down the road.

Um, no -- we don't vote to accept a patch and *then* find out
what's in it.  (Not referring to the interop question.)

>>- Why are people talking as though the code is FINAL
> 
> Its a stable implementation that does what it says on the tin. See  
> the test cases for example

Dims asked about what was on the tin, and the response
was 'we'll update the status with that after we've
accepted it.'  Not acceptable as stated.

Let's slow down.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQ+JnvZrNPMCpn3XdAQKb1AQAit5HlG6LcBG0pgUP403ID73AgJHY1PbZ
/8elRGFPfuwbcuYkQGXX8XMRetEHheKd9F+FteNPIFMzgO5c+bAhtuFJhRSxNMiA
NDCjxNBeipGMYemktXxT9+M4qKHwLrqtxcUfLt4lzNyYlolwrGFdaKlzpLP9pbUV
jMp7ILhSeqs=
=doml
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org