Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9221 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2006 05:40:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2006 05:40:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 47058 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2006 05:42:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46920 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2006 05:42:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46909 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2006 05:42:34 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:42:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of hedhman@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.204] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:42:33 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so915322nzi for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:42:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=QUH+iXhVnrYio0nhbehEyaYO6P7HI8bhruqLUp84DNhvLL0IwFXahy0NzKwNbI1eJHNczMzfibBuLLcc6H8D6Xn+zrmeB1VH3mYkw1NRLnK2KhIDjUxrOZhcWD/hV7HlC1DXTOC9ap+e+F13FYTONo3Wua7D9qgHsOVVrALiVlo= Received: by 10.36.119.1 with SMTP id r1mr3105779nzc; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from clt-5-142.netcompartner.com ( [218.208.246.79]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c1sm2462710nzd.2006.02.04.21.42.10; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:42:12 -0800 (PST) From: Niclas Hedhman To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] incubate OpenEJB as sub-projects of Geronimo Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:42:07 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602051342.08047.niclas@hedhman.org> Sender: Niclas Hedhman X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote: > OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the > proposal here: I think this is a good idea. However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo's incubation?? After all, it was one of the cornerstones to get Geronimo off the ground, wasn't it... Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org