incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Account requests for Incubator projects
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:20:34 GMT
On 2/23/2006 9:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:

>Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>  
>
>>On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:46, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Why not just modify incubator procedure to make it clear that
>>>
>>>1) Mentors make the requests and
>>>
>>>2) They sign the email w/ the title "$PODLING_NAME Mentor"
>>>
>>>Now #2 don't prevent someone from misrepresenting themselves - which
>>>would have to be dealt with - but rather it allows us to not act on but
>>>simply reply back to those that ask for accounts w/o representing
>>>themselves as mentors...
>>>      
>>>
>>Infra doesn't want emails with requests. They want JIRA issues for better 
>>tracking of progress et al.
>>
>>Make a list what the issue must contain, for instance;
>>
>> * Proper title according to some template.
>> * URL to VOTE SUMMARY,
>> * Name of Mentor
>> * Incubator General and/or PMC mailing list as a subscriber, so that someone
>>   can step in and hit the breaks if it wrong.
>> * List of Resources.
>>
>>and whatever else the Infra people like to see...
>>
>>Then keep a template somewhere, which the Mentor copy/paste into the Jira 
>>issue, fills in and off we go :o)
>>    
>>
>
>No. Account requests should go by mail to root@. That's their preferred
>route. Jira requests will likely be ignored.
>  
>

This strikes me as odd.  Jira can be setup so that only authorized 
people can post requests.  We can also create issue types that have the 
required data that needs to be suppiled.  It also allows us to track the 
outstanding requests.


Regards,
Alan



Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message