incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@bristowhill.com>
Subject Re: [doc] podling software releases
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:21:27 GMT
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> ... 
> 
>>(2) Process details
>>
>>I'd like to modify this sentence:
>>
>>"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the 
>>Podling SHALL formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release."
>>
>>And incorporate specific details from 
>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/%3cC5C127EF-E3AB-4D72-A0B8-54FB51923A05@gbiv.com%3e

>>:
>> 
>>"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the 
>>Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling -dev list. If the majority of 
>>all votes is positive, then send a summary of that vote to 
>>general@incubator and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a 
>>release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required."
>  
> ...and no -1 votes.

In 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/%3cC5C127EF-E3AB-4D72-A0B8-54FB51923A05@gbiv.com%3e

Roy wrote:

> Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all
> votes being positive.  Releases do not need consensus.

that suggests some votes could be negative, or perhaps I'm 
misunderstanding?

>>Is this correct and adequate?
>  
> +1 sounds good. Perhaps its good to incorporate by reference the HTTPD
> release guidelines or similar.

good suggestion.

thanks,

  -jean


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message