Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57883 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 21:16:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 21:16:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 8245 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 21:16:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8019 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 21:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7595 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2006 21:16:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:16:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.2] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:16:39 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 3.0-dev) with SMTP ID 926 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:16:16 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: ajax proposal? Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:16:12 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <20060115205700.A56261@minotaur.apache.org> Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Martin Cooper wrote: > I *care* about the quality of what we build here at the ASF. [X] > can very easily cause problems when [...] I have no problem with either of the above (redacted) sentences. However, the answer, in my view, is not to wait for X to become perfected elsewhere. Rather, if there is something wrong, and it is here, contribute to fixing it, even if the contributions are just kibbitzing. Even if you don't contribute code, if you raise perfectly valid issues, and they are ignored, that would be an indicator that the project is not right. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org