Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68550 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2006 01:57:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2006 01:57:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 18082 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2006 01:57:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17712 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2006 01:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17699 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2006 01:57:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:57:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.2] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:57:23 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 3.0-dev) with SMTP ID 410 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:57:02 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: ajax proposal? Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:57:01 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <43CE0FA2.705@apache.org> Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rapha�l Luta wrote: > I thought it would be safe to assume that Zimbra collaboration suite > uses the AjaxTk. If it doesn't then I'm even more worried about that > codebase ;) Why? >>>An established codebase is *much* more difficult to restructure >>>than starting from scratch. >> Apache SOAP -> Apache Axis >> Tomcat 3 -> Tomcat 4 -> Tomcat 5 -> Tomcat 5.5 ... >> Jetspeed 1 -> Jetspeed 2 ;-) > My point exactly ! > Most of these transitions have not been a smooth ride even though > they are successful: it takes time and a resilient community to > manage these. No one said that doing it was necessarily easy, but isn't creating resilient, healthy, communities a major part of our purpose? --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org