Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74476 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2006 17:41:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2006 17:41:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 62474 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2006 17:41:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62302 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2006 17:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62291 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2006 17:41:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:41:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.30] (HELO smtp4-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.30) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:41:51 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.120] (cube.luta.org [81.57.121.143]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3D4ED4A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:41:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43D3C3D6.2040803@apache.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:41:42 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Luta?= Organization: ASF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: ajax proposal? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rapha�l Luta wrote: > > >>do you really feel comfortable when the main point of oversight >>for the ASF in an incubated project is in the pay of the project >>sponsor and quite possibly internally reporting to one of the >>project committer ? The potential for conflict is huge and I >>would personnally hate to be in such an awkward position. > > > I can think of examples supporting your view, but most probably support > Roy's. By trying to get at least 3 ASF Members as active Mentors, perhaps > we can better address the concern. > Do we have other incubating projects following the Kabuki pattern, ie all initial committers from a single company with the mentor salaried by the same company ? I'd sure like to know how these evolved if we have any. I'm glad Martin has been added as a commmitter to Kabuli but I would feel much better about it if other existing memebrs/committers willing to work on that project would join. > >>others from Portals may wish to give it a try but I somehow >>doubt it given that the toolkit didn't even show up in the >>short list when we first investigated the field for our >>AJAX support. > > > Was it reviewed? Or just didn't show up on the radar? > As far as i know, it has never been reviewed on the mailing-list probably because it didn't show up on the radar. -- Rapha�l Luta - raphael@apache.org Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java http://portals.apache.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org