Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17130 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 23:34:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 23:34:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4226 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 23:34:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3777 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 23:34:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3755 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2006 23:34:12 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:34:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [67.19.173.84] (HELO vanadium.sabren.com) (67.19.173.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:34:11 -0800 Received: from [192.168.2.100] (cpe-066-057-027-065.nc.res.rr.com [66.57.27.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by vanadium.sabren.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0GNXoru027132 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:33:50 -0500 Message-ID: <43CC2D5E.4020505@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:33:50 -0500 From: Sam Ruby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] AJAX Toolkit Proposal - Updated References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > We seem to agree on the rest, but the proposal should make it clear, > since those are points that appear to concern (some) others. To be honest, I would rather those points be placed on an general incubator page as they apply to every proposal. * No codebase within the ASF is to be considered an exclusive location for a general technology within the ASF. * All initial codebases are just that: initial. Once the code is here, if people feel that the code sucks or the architecture sucks, or whatever else someone wants to complain about, all parties understood that the future direction of the architecture and code is, as is everything at the ASF, subject to communal will. * Other contributors interested in any ASF codebase, with or without existing codebases, are free to contribute, or to propose additional related projects. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org