Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58118 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 05:00:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 05:00:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 81037 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 05:00:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80940 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 05:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80926 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2006 05:00:07 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:00:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:00:06 -0800 Received: (qmail 57914 invoked by uid 1339); 16 Jan 2006 04:59:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 04:59:45 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:59:45 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Cooper To: general@incubator.apache.org, mmarinschek@apache.org Subject: Re: ajax proposal? In-Reply-To: <5a99335f0601050159s14fc7868l636aa903dad3b091@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060115205700.A56261@minotaur.apache.org> References: <1136413966.6167.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <16d6c6200601041750h369d85e8y26d6d827d0144230@mail.gmail.com> <20060105013326.V34379@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> <5a99335f0601050159s14fc7868l636aa903dad3b091@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Martin Marinschek wrote: > We could of course also set-up quality standards which have to be > fullfilled before the project _leaves_ incubation. That's a good bar > to set... > > As the name "MyFaces" has been mentioned quite a bit, I'll explain our > situation. We currently use the prototype framework (one of the widely > used projects in the market, which Martin Cooper by the way doesn't > like either, due to namespacing issues). So, if Zimbra has the same > problems, we don't really have a need for the library. Whether I like Prototype or not isn't really the point. The point is that I *care* about the quality of what we build here at the ASF. Prototype can very easily cause problems when combined with other JavaScript code, and this situation is even worse in a portlet environment, so I simply want to make sure that the MyFaces team isn't setting itself up for problems by relying on it. -- Martin Cooper > We are hoping for a major donation regarding javascript with ADF Faces > - haven't had any chance to look on the sourcecode so far, though. > Maybe this will settle all our javascript needs and we'll stop looking > out for anything else. > > regards, > > Martin > > On 1/5/06, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >> >> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Martin Cooper wrote: >> >>> On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >>>> >>>> So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with >>>> the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision?? >> .. >>> Personally, I would prefer that the ASF not accept _any_ AJAX framework at >>> this point in time. The area is relatively new and in a great deal of flux >>> right now, and "crowning" one of them with the ASF brand will create a de >>> facto standard instead of letting the market decide, whether we like it or >> >> We are part of that market - and I have no illusions about our ability to >> set standards; we canot; we ONLY seem to do so when we happen to a) to >> jump on the boat with the right technology and b) get the market to play >> in our playground. (Marginally helped of course by the fact that so many >> talented peopel and companies come to play here that we do set the odd's >> for 'a' and have 'b' causal). >> >> If your argument is that the quality of Zimbra code is relatively low; or >> too immature by itself - and that is why you worry about spoiling the >> market by betting on the wrong horse - then we should simply reject -this- >> proposal based on the fact that there is a) not enough quality in the >> donation and b) no hope for it to improve in our playground. >> >> But in general - having the ASF offer it's eco system a place where we all >> can work on Ajax (and have synergy with all the portal code we have, with >> MyFaces^H^H^H^H^H^HOurFaces) seems like the right thing to do -when- there >> are sufficient people interested to work on it. Which is the right >> validating feedback loop. >> >> Dw. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org