Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22096 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2006 23:48:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2006 23:48:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 21862 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 23:48:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21736 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2006 23:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21725 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2006 23:48:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:48:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mfncooper@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.202 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.202] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:48:07 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i3so1214979wra for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:47:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lqqy/OxV61NAKkDTjOMeTILtBP2MckJWYOVfMLsXzayLQc2cMo1wAR3R4Pufhw1J5Z2GSEBM5CTctrlcr77T4ZamT5NH3o6Rh24eCHpFQY3gJQD/WjWzUzMARb0t5fA6NS0mGnoRZPq8n3ZEXyfEkaRAQ5N521MUfoRD0ta5oIw= Received: by 10.65.194.17 with SMTP id w17mr2983610qbp; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.97.6 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:47:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <16d6c6200601161547m3baefdbei966e668fb230d0ab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:47:46 -0800 From: Martin Cooper Sender: mfncooper@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: ajax proposal? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16826_19734775.1137455266013" References: <16d6c6200601161342x1ecbb350x70126fde8c51d38b@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_16826_19734775.1137455266013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 1/16/06, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Martin Cooper wrote: > > > whether I get involved with the Zimbra toolkit, and try to help them > > see the light, I need to make a personal decision between putting my > > energy into that, here at the ASF, or putting it into a non-ASF > > project that is already on the right track. I know I don't have the > > energy to do both. ;-) > > If you take your comment to a conclusion, you could be saying that if you > don't have time to contribute here, the project should be rejected. > > Yes, I agree that I've reduced your comment to the absurd conclusion, and > one which you most certainly did not intend. Correct, I did not. The only reason I made that comment at all was because it wasn't clear to me whether your earlier comment, encouraging me to "contribute to fixing it", was in reference to the use of Prototype in MyFaces or to a potential redesign of the Zimbra code, so I chose to addres= s both. But what is a solution? You appear to be against trying to incubate the > project because of its current architecture, others appear to want to try= . > Do we accept it because they want it give it a try, or reject it without > trying because you don't have time to help fix it? I'll take that as rhetorical. But I'd be curious to know how many of those who have expressed an interest in incubating Zimbra, other than the Zimbra folks themselves, are JavaScript developers planning on contributing to the code base, versus people who just think having an AJAX project at the ASF would be cool, and hope other people will do the (coding) work. Clearly I'm a lone voice here, albeit making a fair amount of noise. Given that nobody else seems to share my views on the architecture or on the effect of the ASF brand on the AJAX world, and given that the incubator appears to be a "just knock and you're in" project anyway, I've assumed pretty much from the get-go that I'm fighting a lost cause here. But that doesn't mean I want to go quietly. -- Martin Cooper I'll note that although I'm not familar with Zimbra, there is another > proposed project for the Incubator that I am familar with, due to working > with another project that uses it, and I seriously dislike it (I'd never > use > it). Yes, I'm being intentionally vague, because I don't want to > prejudice > it, and there are other people quite keen to incubate the project. > > FWIW, I would want to see your technical concerns addressed before > graduation, but so far, we have had little if any discussion of what thos= e > tecnical issues really are, or so it seems from the archives. > > --- Noel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > ------=_Part_16826_19734775.1137455266013--