Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46563 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2005 19:08:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2005 19:08:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 47409 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2005 19:07:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47287 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2005 19:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47273 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2005 19:07:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:07:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:07:38 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E459859562 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:07:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Is the incubator out of control? Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:07:16 -0500 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> The Chairman does not have ultimate authority, and their >> PoV or opinion does not count more or less than others, >> nor does it mean that their interpretation is the rule :) > > Right, but there is clearly a difference of opinion, so which part > of "the > Board can clarify the intent, and I would welcome that > clarification" needs > further explanation? ;-) > None ;) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org