Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9441 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2005 13:14:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Dec 2005 13:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 84473 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2005 13:14:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84360 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2005 13:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84349 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2005 13:14:38 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 05:14:38 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 05:14:37 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8030185B4B7 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:14:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: <96B33608-506E-46A1-A31B-7B2E4F342B80@sauria.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Is the incubator out of control? Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:14:15 -0500 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Dec 22, 2005, at 6:23 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Erik Abele wrote: >> >> So nobody has the right but you do? Or how can your smack-down of >> the Tuscany proposal be interpreted? > > Because Tuscany was proposed to the incubator PMC (not another PMC) > and I do have a vote here. It's interesting to note that if Dims would have, as he suggested in one of his Email messages, to simply have the WS PMC vote on the proposal as is, and it would have passed it, Roy's concerns would have been totally moot. So no matter how good or vague the proposal, if voted on by a PMC, it's allowed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org