Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15940 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2005 14:06:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2005 14:06:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 69629 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2005 14:06:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69560 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2005 14:06:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69549 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2005 14:06:40 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 06:06:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 06:06:39 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1254851402 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:06:18 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: References: <43A89372.7030607@apache.org> <16d6c6200512201649r5ab92c24r76aeb7916b1c9c30@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Is the incubator out of control? Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:06:17 -0500 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:50 AM, Ted Leung wrote: > On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: > >> Personally, I am less than happy at seeing yet another large project >> proposed from a corporate source (and IBM at that), along with a >> dozen new >> committers who have not earned their merit at the ASF as most >> committers >> have. I feel the ASF is losing its way, and becoming a repository for >> corporate open-sourcing along with taking on responsibility for >> building >> communities around corporate code bases. I suspect I'm in the >> minority at >> the ASF, and I'm undoubtedly in the minority here in the >> incubator. But >> there doesn't seem to be a way for the incubator to say "no >> thanks", other >> than by a podling failing the incubation process, and that seems >> wrong to >> me. > > The merits of the particular proposal aside, I wanted to comment > on this paragraph. This year at ApacheCon I was surprised to find > that a number of people also feel that the ASF is growing far too > quickly. I know that are some people who believe that the growth > that we are experiencing is indicative of our success. > Unfortunately, I don't agree with that. I think that the > incubation process is setting an incredibly low bar for access to > the Apache brand name, and this is a bad thing. Corporations see > the value of the brand name, that's why they want to come here and > are willing to put up with all our overhead. > Unless we are very careful, Incubator will become a much larger mess than the Jakarta project ever was... Which would be quite ironic. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org