Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22873 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2005 10:42:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2005 10:42:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 53799 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2005 10:42:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53421 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2005 10:42:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53410 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2005 10:42:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:42:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [157.193.49.18] (HELO pecan.UGent.be) (157.193.49.18) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:42:14 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pecan.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B301B3526DB for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:41:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from pecan.UGent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gorilla.UGent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32044-09 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:41:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (otsrv1.iic.ugent.be [157.193.121.51]) by pecan.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9205335267F for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.123.115] (host115 [192.168.123.115]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jBM9ch323779 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:38:43 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) In-Reply-To: References: <43A89372.7030607@apache.org> <16d6c6200512201649r5ab92c24r76aeb7916b1c9c30@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <59b98abbce19f575343920c183cd8cd5@outerthought.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steven Noels Subject: Re: Is the incubator out of control? Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:38:53 +0100 To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Virus-Scanned: by UGent DICT X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 21 Dec 2005, at 10:50, Ted Leung wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't agree with that. I think that the incubation > process is setting an incredibly low bar for access to the Apache > brand name, and this is a bad thing. Corporations see the value of > the brand name, that's why they want to come here and are willing to > put up with all our overhead. I agree but i believe we're picking the wrong example. For me, the low bar is because many code donations are happening in the folds of other-than-the-Incubator PMC: The Incubator PMC only needs to care about IP and legal blahblah, thus the receiving PMCs are tasked with community and brand abuse stuff. Combine this with mentors preferring to read and use the system as it has been designed and drafted literally, rather than according to what the (somewhat intangible) Apache Way dictates, and this is bound to create tension. Quite frankly, I don't have the slightest idea anymore what is happening in the WebServices and Geronimo corner of Apache. That's either an indication of the fact that I should read more mail (yeah right), or something slightly more worrying. Too much, too fast, too eager, too soon. That way, we'll burn out rather than fade away. :) -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought Open Source Java & XML stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org