Looks good to me.

Guys, should we not begin to create a specs project in Jakarta?  It 
seems that we have a consensus.  What are the next steps?


Regards,
Alan

On 12/30/2005 6:14 AM, James Carman wrote:

>Why not do like we do with the commons?
>
>spec-javamail
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flamefew@gmail.com] 
>Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 9:08 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Cc: jcp-open@apache.org
>Subject: Re: Starting a java specs project
>
>On 12/27/05, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I think this would be great!  I know it's silly, but I get annoyed at
>>the fact that many of the J2EE spec jars that I use from apache have
>>"geronimo-" in the jar name but It's just the ASL 2.0 spec jars that
>>I'm using and not really a geronimo implementation.  In general, I
>>think that this would make a good TLP since it would provide a good
>>area for cross project involvement.
>>    
>>
>
>[presuming it was stored at Jakarta Specs]
>
>Do you think they should be apache-xxxx or jakarta-xxxx, or either
>would be fine?
>
>Would 'jakarta-spec-javamail' be too much of a mouthful?
>
>Hen
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>  
>