On 12/30/2005 10:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>On 12/30/05, Thomas Dudziak <tomdzk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On 12/30/05, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Reasons for not Jakarta:
>>>
>>>*) Java specific.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I wonder why it has to be Java-specific ? Aren't there any standards
>>that contains bindings for several languages ?
>>
>>
>
>Good point. I originally meant that if we wanted specs from other
>languages to be there, Jakarta wouldn't make sense. However for
>something like SAX or DOM, it's less about another language spec and
>more about a cross-language spec.
>
>No idea to be honest. If we go with Jakarta or JCP as a location; I
>think we just treat them as exceptions to be dealt with.
>
>
I think that we're over thinking this. Let's start w/ Java and cross
the multi-language issue bridge when we come to it.
Regards,
Alan
|