Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4590 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2005 18:11:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2005 18:11:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 11563 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2005 18:11:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11450 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2005 18:11:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11437 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2005 18:11:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:11:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of cliffschmidt@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.204] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:11:42 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o1so185821nzf for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:11:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WWLD/9m4H5lEWJPQ4CSZqq00vvSADWeffIdyhvhWSEXOogIchlb0IVtMlMoHm6obtFXaQZjTyEt4Qk9cg1Z8qIVFDTkWHLcPfMBh3Nbd82AW55uzd7PyiOGToH98n/oZRskEDpcGU1kCl/bIAogGrYE0ZKDA/y4KihdGqKmv9Nw= Received: by 10.36.252.46 with SMTP id z46mr1509557nzh; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.46.7 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:11:26 -0700 From: Cliff Schmidt To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: a few steps before approving a project In-Reply-To: <7033D156203ECABC55EA8B99@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4316FD3A.5090105@apache.org> <200509011628.j81GS8DO014316@carmanconsulting.com> <7033D156203ECABC55EA8B99@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/1/05, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On September 1, 2005 10:50:20 AM -0700 Cliff Schmidt > wrote: >=20 > > If the answer to one or more of the questions was not simply "yes", > > then there might be another step or two, such as requiring you or your > > employer to sign and submit a "software grant". Some folks might say > > you always have to sign and submit a software grant for all large > > contributions, but with my Legal Affairs hat on, I'm not aware of why > > that would be necessary if the answer to all questions above is "yes". >=20 > For code developed on our public mailing lists, then I don't think a > software grant is warranted; but for works developed wholly outside of th= e > ASF, I think it is prudent to have the grant on file. -- justin Sure - it certainly doesn't hurt, and I don't care enough to debate this point when there are so many other fun things to debate these days. ;-) I'll wait to discuss this when (if ever) I hear complaints that the software grant becomes an burden for committers who aren't sure when a large patch that includes some old functions they wrote years ago turns into something requiring a software grant. Cliff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org