Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7374 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2005 22:05:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2005 22:05:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 22097 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2005 22:05:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21763 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2005 22:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21750 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2005 22:05:50 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:05:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (asf.osuosl.org: error in processing during lookup of mail@leosimons.com) Received: from [192.87.17.19] (HELO netlx050.vf.utwente.nl) (192.87.17.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:06:05 -0700 Received: from [130.89.169.128] (giraffe.student.utwente.nl [130.89.169.128]) by netlx050.vf.utwente.nl (8.11.7/HKD) with ESMTP id j81M5hEt014616 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 00:05:45 +0200 Message-ID: <43177B37.1020105@leosimons.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:05:43 +0200 From: Leo Simons User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050727) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: The Incubator and Infrastructure X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: mail@leosimons.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi gang! For people with no time to read any further: if you're, as a committer, relatively new to apache, you should subscribe to infrastructure _at_ apache _dot_ org using your @apache.org e-mail address and spend some time reading http://www.apache.org/dev/. --- Here's an infra@-related rant for y'all. Best intentions, of course! New projects entering incubation and projects graduating from incubation are a large part of the workload for the apache infrastructure team. They cause a stream of account requests, mailing list creation&move requests, website creation and move requests, jira-related requests, svn-related requests, and much more. Indirectly, incubation of new projects leads to more FAQs and Frequently Made Mistakes since many new people are brought in. The infrastructure team does not have the manpower neccessary to educate all these new people and new projects about the (ever-changing) infrastructure policies and procedure (that's an understatement, infra@ is drowning in work). I would like to see the incubator PMC (not per se in its role as PMC, just the people around here) take a larger responsibility there. I'd like to see everyone who is mentoring a project subscribed to infrastructure _at_ apache _dot_ org, and similarly I'd like to see at least a few people from every project undergoing incubation around on that list. By the time a project graduates, its developers should be aware of how infrastructure stuff works (or doesn't work!) around here. I'd like to see some info from this message make it onto the incubator website, but I'd also like to see very concrete infrastructure-related documentation ("Here's how you request a new mailing list") to get off of the incubator website (it needs to be on the infra@ website where the infra team will see it and on sunny days keep it up-to-date). (...) A concrete, recent example of a workflow issue -- ideally it is mentors that are requesting accounts on behalf of the incubator PMC using a properly filled out template. Having new people (non-committers) requesting their own accounts without following due dilligence or notifying the proper PMC is not OK ("Hi I'm John Doe and I'd like an account for project X as I was voted in" does not make sense to root@!), and I think its up to the incubator to drive home that fact. Similarly, many new people coming to the ASF are not too familiar with the disorganised and decentralized nature of our "support" facilities, and adjusting to that mind set (*you* keep track of *your* requests, things *do* fall through the cracks; you *need* to make every effort to save time of the volunteer handling your request) is something that I think the incubator should work on. Finally, new project communities need to "get" more than they seem to do now on average, that our infrastructure is run by volunteers and that basically they should do a "fair share" of the infrastructural work. In other words, we want (nay need!) some of the new people that come into apache to stick around as infrastructure volunteers. thanks for reading all the way to the bottom! happy incubating, - Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org