From general-return-5699-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sat Jul 16 14:43:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77201 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2005 14:43:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2005 14:43:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 85805 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 14:42:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85705 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 14:42:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85692 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2005 14:42:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:42:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.132] (HELO e34.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:42:53 -0700 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6GEgqfj406128 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:42:52 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j6GEgpbm374666 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:42:52 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6GEgpk6009891 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:42:51 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-127-21.mts.ibm.com [9.48.127.21]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6GEgnwH009872 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:42:51 -0600 Message-ID: <42D91CE6.60705@debrunners.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:42:46 -0700 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Derby 10.1 incubating release References: <54ac72d70507151430789a6eed@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050716005924.04dc5580@pop3.rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050716005924.04dc5580@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 04:30 PM 7/15/2005, Andrew McIntyre wrote: > >>Andrew McIntyre wrote: >> >>>Hello Incubator, >>> >>>On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request >>>permission to post the files you can find here: >>> >>>http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/ >> >>[...] >>Should I have posted this as a vote, instead of just as a query? > > > Exactly :) Polls can be interesting, but the bottom line is that > three ppmc/pmc/members vote to release the code, and you have more > +1's than -1's, it's a release plain and simple. Are the votes gettting confused here, as you say 'ppmc/pmc'. A vote to release has already been held on derby-dev (as Andrew said) that included votes from derby-ppmc. This request is for 'explicit approval of the Incubator PMC' to post the release as an incubator release. Thus I would say votes from derby-ppmc are not binding, only those from Incubator-PMC. Dan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org