incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roy T. Fielding <field...@gbiv.com>
Subject Re: Harmony: project purpose
Date Sat, 07 May 2005 19:40:51 GMT
On May 6, 2005, at 9:20 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The aforementioned issues between GPL and AL aside, I am still trying 
> to see
> how the TCK licensing restrictions are compatible with the GPL.  
> According
> to the FSF licensing page, the Apache License is deemed by the FSF to 
> be
> "incompatible with the GPL because it has a specific requirement that 
> is not
> in the GPL."  So how much worse are the TCK licensing restrictions?  
> For
> examples, see the modified version of the AL that has been drafted for
> dealing with JSR's:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/JSR-LICENSE-2.0.txt.  As I read
> things, it really does not seem possible to meet the requirements of 
> both
> the GPL and the Java licenses.  And any bending necessary to accept 
> the TCK
> terms should help to address the AL issue as well.

Note that, although the JSR license above is a proposal that has since
been modified (it is working through the approval process right now as
part of Day's JSR 170), the reciprocal patent license is actually a
requirement of the JSPA.  So, even if Sun has some other terms in
mind for their own TCKs, they will have to include a patent termination
clause that is almost identical to the one that the FSF claims in
incompatible with the GPL.

Personally, I think the FSF should just create a Java-specific license
that says what they want.

....Roy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message