Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23327 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2005 04:05:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2005 04:05:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 43684 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2005 04:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43562 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2005 04:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43547 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2005 04:05:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from devtech.com (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:05:19 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.2.1-dev) with SMTP ID 625 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:05:05 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: Ruby Lucene port - directly under Lucene TLP? Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:05:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050317033143.83233.qmail@web31103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > If an existing TLP, such as Lucene, wants to develop a port, such as a > Ruby port of the Lucene library, can the Lucene PMC invite that port > and its developers under its wings directly > this port is not an existing external project, but a brand new port > that would be developed under Lucene from scratch by a group of 4-5 > developers. If you are developing this within the TLP in ASF resources (our mailing lists, source control, etc.), you do not come through the Incubator. And if you are just talking about adding new Committers to an existing community, you don't need to come through the Incubator. One can see that grey areas could exist. It seems to me that it depends on whether you are creating a new community or are integrating new people into an existing one. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org