On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
>>> only to
>>> do the required IP checklist.
>> Right.
>> By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project?
>> The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and
>> register the IP stuff here w/ the incubator.
>> I hope I'm just misunderstanding, but this appears to be a proposal
>> to create a new project at the ASF called "Lucene4c"
>
> The proposal was to create Lucene4c as a a subproject of the Lucene
> TLP. We weren't clear what the best way to proceed was, so Erik had
> me make a proposal here. If instead we can just go through the Lucene
> PMC that's fine with me, but I was under the impression that new
> subprojects are supposed to go through the incubator. I know that's
> what happened with the HTTPD-CLI project, for example.
>
It should also happen with Lucene4c as well.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|