Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10357 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2004 15:17:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2004 15:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 83608 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2004 15:17:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83410 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2004 15:17:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75157 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2004 03:30:39 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) In-Reply-To: <416DB34A.3030503@wingsofhermes.org> To: Berin Lautenbach Cc: commons-dev@xml.apache.org, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart , general@incubator.apache.org, general@xml.apache.org, Jeff Suttor , Suresh.K@Sun.COM, xalan-dev@xml.apache.org, xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.2CF1 June 9, 2003 Message-ID: From: Neil Graham Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:30:27 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML04/25/M/IBM(Release 6.0.4|June 01, 2004) at 10/15/2004 23:30:29, Serialize complete at 10/15/2004 23:30:29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, Berin Lautenbach wrote on 10/13/2004 06:59:22 PM: > I'm assuming that this is something that XML-Commons/Xerces/Xalan wish > to do? Here's a +1 from someone who's committed to Xerces-J and xml-commons. If either project didn't want to move up to the latest standard API's, that sure would be an interesting situation. :) > If that's the case, then I don't think we need to go through the full > incubation process (Noel - thoughts appreciated!) - we only need a code > grant from Sun (we can't take something into our repository until we are > sure we have appropriate legal rights to do so) + someone needs to fill > out the incubation docs to show that everything is AOK. As I've argued before, it seems to me that this is a case where some Apache committers have simply gone away for a while, developed some code based on the Apache projects to which they have commit privileges, and now have reached a point where they can commit the code back. It's not a case where a new component is being added; simply where a rather large update is being undertaken. But I'm no lawyer, so I have no allusions that this argument will actually count for anything. :) But given the apparent unanimity in the communities about this being a good thing, and the fact this thread's been pretty quiet the last couple of days, it would be nice to get some status on when the granting/incubating formalities might be done with. Cheers! Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org