Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73221 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 01:25:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2004 01:25:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 94398 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2004 01:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94290 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2004 01:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94276 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2004 01:25:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.16] (HELO relay02.pair.com) (209.68.5.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:25:54 -0800 Received: (qmail 30911 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 01:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO LANKABOOK) (203.94.84.117) by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Nov 2004 01:25:50 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 203.94.84.117 Message-ID: <147101c4bfb1$b6ca62d0$c24f4109@LANKABOOK> From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" To: References: <9da4f45204103015037e866646@mail.gmail.com> <1099220836.4416.12.camel@swan.rkunet.org> Subject: Re: Idea of JCMS Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 07:24:57 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Rolf Kulemann" writes: > > But JCMS also claims to support/use standards like JCR. AFAICS Slide > does not support JCR. I do not know why, but I saw some posting giving > me the feeling it was due to lack of collaboration between the former > jcrri team and the Slide team. I don't know the scope of these projects but ... If the only problem is that Slide doesn't support a standard (that presumably came after its inception) then I think the right thing to do is to go and implement that standard on top of the existing codebase. Is there some technical reason why that can't be done? If not we're not living up to the community building spirit by creating, in effect, a community which is designed to kill an existing community. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org