Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96800 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2004 23:15:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2004 23:15:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 34761 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2004 23:15:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34609 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2004 23:15:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34595 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2004 23:15:11 -0000 Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) (24.25.9.103) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:15:11 -0700 Received: from noel770 (cae88-22-141.sc.rr.com [24.88.22.141]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i5DNEuVv005185 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 19:14:57 -0400 (EDT) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 19:14:50 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <42AEFE34-BBB4-11D8-9332-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Steven, I am having some difficulty reconciling some of your comments, so please take the time to clarify for my (and judging from Gianugo Rabellino's comments, that of others) benefit. Fair warning: this message is likely to come across as harsh. That is NOT directed at you. Nor at any other individual. Even if I wanted to, which is neither my intent nor the Apache way, I do not know enough about what has been going on with Lenya to direct criticisms at individuals. Steven Noels wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > What is your take on the readiness of Lenya to leave the Incubator, > > and on the question of putting out a milestone? Just as a reminder, > > the distribution would have to be tagged as an incubator distribution, > > not an ASF release. > My take is that - at last, and pushed forward primarily by the group of > non-Wyona, newbie committers - the urgent need for release and exit has > been recognized and is in the process of being addressed adequately. > For one reason or another, this has never been pushed forward by the > original donators, but now, the momentum has changed to a positive > effect. > All this being considered, I'm +1 on release and consecutively exit > from the incubator. Leaving aside the fact that Lenya has posted several "RC" distributions to www.apache.org/dist without proper process or approval, why is there an "urgent need for release"? And why release first, exit later? Why not get cleaned up, exit and then have a real release? Personally, I suspect that the "ability" to do the aforementioned "releases" has been a factor underlying the lack of impetus within Lenya to get clean and exit. Thinking on it, we should probably delete those files, which were never approved by either the Incubator or Cocoon PMCs. Baring commentary to the contrary, I will do so within the next day or so (leaving time for legitimate contrary views). I do appreciate the desire to exit, and would like to know that if Lenya does exit to Cocoon that the oversight issues that appear to have previously marked the Lenya incubation have been corrected. I am much more concerned about the Lenya community than the release of its code, and see the former as gating the latter. You're also making a similar statement: > I'll be carefully looking after ASF brand abuse however in the > forthcoming months. This entire incubation episode has left me with > dubious feelings: for a long time, I've been thinking that Lenya would > be a sad example of premature ASF donation. It is good to see that some > volunteers finally stepped up and managed to create real momentum, and > I can only hope they will last for a long time. Lenya will still need > to acquire more external contributors to help them with this effort. I'm glad to hear about the latter part of that paragraph, but you have to admit that the first part of the paragraph is enough to give one pause. So please explain why we should have a incubator release while there are still so many questions regarding the viability of the community? Yes, you are indicating that there are new members within the Lenya community who are focused on doing everything properly. Great, but I'm still trying to understand why there is a need to put out a distribution rather than put all of the energy into helping Lenya conclude incubation and then release. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org