Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52744 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2004 10:33:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2004 10:33:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 63216 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2004 10:33:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63100 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2004 10:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59598 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2004 07:18:24 -0000 X-Authenticated: #382625 Subject: RE: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release From: Rolf Kulemann Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1087197489.3350.12.camel@samson.rkunet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:18:09 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 01:14, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Steven, > > I am having some difficulty reconciling some of your comments, so please > take the time to clarify for my (and judging from Gianugo Rabellino's > comments, that of others) benefit. > > Fair warning: this message is likely to come across as harsh. That is NOT > directed at you. Nor at any other individual. Even if I wanted to, which > is neither my intent nor the Apache way, I do not know enough about what has > been going on with Lenya to direct criticisms at individuals. > > Steven Noels wrote: > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > What is your take on the readiness of Lenya to leave the Incubator, > > > and on the question of putting out a milestone? Just as a reminder, > > > the distribution would have to be tagged as an incubator distribution, > > > not an ASF release. > > > My take is that - at last, and pushed forward primarily by the group of > > non-Wyona, newbie committers - the urgent need for release and exit has > > been recognized and is in the process of being addressed adequately. > > For one reason or another, this has never been pushed forward by the > > original donators, but now, the momentum has changed to a positive > > effect. > > > All this being considered, I'm +1 on release and consecutively exit > > from the incubator. > > Leaving aside the fact that Lenya has posted several "RC" distributions to > www.apache.org/dist without proper process or approval, why is there an > "urgent need for release"? Because we know we made a mistake and we want to do it better and right this time. -- RolfKulemann "There is inherently no silverbullet" - F.Brooks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org