Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79686 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2003 07:24:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Dec 2003 07:24:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 52145 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2003 07:23:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52077 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2003 07:23:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52064 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2003 07:23:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailr-1.tiscali.it) (212.123.84.81) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Dec 2003 07:23:51 -0000 Received: from ppp-82-84-236-209.cust-adsl.tiscali.it (HELO apache.org) (82.84.236.209) by mailr-1.tiscali.it with ESMTP; 29 Dec 2003 08:24:02 +0100 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Message-ID: <3FEFD5C8.9050909@apache.org> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:20:40 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: PPMCs and oversight References: <3FEC0755.3040201@apache.org> <3FECAA74.6050207@wingsofhermes.org> <20031227231356.GE926@clove.org> <3FEE5F8C.4010600@wingsofhermes.org> <3FEEC228.7000305@apache.org> <20031229040133.GB2766@clove.org> <3FEFD4E8.6070107@wingsofhermes.org> In-Reply-To: <3FEFD4E8.6070107@wingsofhermes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Lautenbach wrote: > Aaron Bannert wrote: > ... >> How about this: >> The PPMC starts with every Incubator PMC person who wants on >> the PPMC. New PPMC members are then voted in by the current >> PPMC members. > > It's a start. But you also need the landing PMC members. > > Am not so sure about committers. Like you, I think I'd like to see them > voted in by the PPMC. Again? They are already voted in with the proposal, so I don't see why they have to be voted in *again*. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org