Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9697 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 21:51:21 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 21:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 56183 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 21:50:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56123 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 21:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56073 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 21:50:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chromium.sabren.com) (209.61.183.90) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 21:50:53 -0000 Received: from apache.org (rdu57-27-066.nc.rr.com [66.57.27.66]) (authenticated) by chromium.sabren.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB2LpQq20746 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:51:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCD093B.7000201@apache.org> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 16:50:51 -0500 From: Sam Ruby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Incubator Reorg References: <3FCCB90F.4020603@apache.org> <3FCCC522.4040901@apache.org> <3FCCCCAB.5080303@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3FCCCCAB.5080303@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Thanks for bringing up this question. > > > Thanks Sam for this very nice mail, I agree with what you say. > > I have just one point: > ... > >> For that reason, I believe that there needs to be a clear distinction >> between PPMC members who are primarily observers and vetoers of last >> resort, and those who are active in the construction of the project. > > Is it really needed? I guess that those that are not so involved will > automatically partecipate less be just observers, without us having to > formalize such a figure. That would have been my guess too until the last few days. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org