Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24445 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2003 23:04:27 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Dec 2003 23:04:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 85846 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2003 23:04:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85768 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2003 23:04:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85742 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2003 23:04:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost.clove.org) (209.237.225.73) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Dec 2003 23:04:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 99403 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2003 23:04:16 -0000 Received: from dsl017-044-108.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO gandalf.clove.org) (aaron@69.17.44.108) by grover.clove.org with SMTP; 27 Dec 2003 23:04:16 -0000 Received: by gandalf.clove.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8CBA9247598; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:04:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:04:12 -0800 From: Aaron Bannert To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] PPMCs for Incubating Projects Message-ID: <20031227230412.GC926@clove.org> References: <3FE989C6.4040500@apache.org> <1072286352.1612.1173.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3FEC4CA3.8040608@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FEC4CA3.8040608@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 03:58:43PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>The status updates are posted to general@incubator.apache.org, prior ACK > >>from any Incubator PMC member. > > > >Does this need an ACK? > > I reckon it would need a "go-ahead" from the community, requiring an ACK > from a mentor is probably too strong. Besides, the general incubator > list is still "here", so we can always eventually rectify. We should just say that the PPMC should cooperatively create the status document and send it to the appropriate mailing lists once concensus is reached within their own group. We don't care how they do it as long as it gets done. :) > >s/all legal issues are sorted out/there are no legal issues/ > >Or should we say: there are no obvious potential liabilities? > > Seems better to me, +1 I think it's important that all known legal issues are resolved. I liked Sander's first suggestion: "There are no legal issues." (Meaning that if we find a legal issue later we'll resolve it then.) -aaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org