Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86031 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2003 19:51:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2003 19:51:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 95155 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2003 19:51:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94899 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2003 19:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94886 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2003 19:51:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost.clove.org) (209.237.225.73) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2003 19:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 53046 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2003 19:51:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gandalf.clove.org) (aaron@65.169.214.160) by grover.clove.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2003 19:51:25 -0000 Received: by gandalf.clove.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4BC3D21D7ED; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:50:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:50:53 -0800 From: Aaron Bannert To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] PPMCs for Incubating Projects Message-ID: <20031217195053.GV2290@clove.org> References: <20031216053128.GI2290@clove.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:47:43PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > The status update occurs on the PPMC list. Thus, the notion of > > > reporting to the "main Incubator PMC" is a non-issue, as all > > > Incubator PMC members are also on the PPMC. > > > I also disagree with this. The purpose of the report is to present > > a condensed view of the happenings within a project so that others > > can see how things are going. If they are only posted to the PPMC > > list, then who will be the audience? These reports should be going > > to general@incubator.apache.org. > > The status report is a public document, unless there are private items, of > which you can imagine some few. Discussion and approval of the status > report can be on the PPMC list. Let's see how it plays out. Ok, maybe we're talking about different things. It doesn't matter where the report is discussed and approved of, but in the end it should simply be forwarded to the pmc@incubator list so that PMCers who are not deeply involved in the reporting PPMC have a nice summary to read. That's all. It seems to me that you are suggesting that the final report be sent only to the PPMC list, which seems like the wrong audience to me. We want to emulate the relationship the PPMC will have with the board. -aaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org