incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason van Zyl <jvan...@maven.org>
Subject Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC
Date Mon, 08 Dec 2003 02:50:59 GMT
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 21:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 18:33, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until
> > it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can
> > decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for a board vote) or
> > part of an existing project (calling for that project's pmc to vote).
> > Maybe we should have a six month limit on incubation, where the
> > result is promote or punt.
> > 
> > We have no way to measure the worthiness of a project before it has
> > even started
> 
> - test coverage
> - clarity of documentation
> - established user base
> 
> And those are three criterion that can easily be measured and I think
> that is a good start. Something that's far easier to pinpoint than the
> vague term "community". The three above listed criterion are things that
> can easily be faked. Tapestry satisfied these quite easily. 
            ^^^
... things that can't be faked ...

> > , and generally speaking we are MUCH MUCH MUCH better off
> > if a project gets started in Apache rather than on sourceforge.
> 
> How so? I'm genuinely interested in why you think so.
> 
> > I don't care if there is some overlap with Wagon, nor do I care for
> > any further discussion about which one is better -- if I can't find
> > some objective criteria for evaluating software, then I obviously
> > don't need that software. Once I need it, I can figure out for myself
> > which one is better -- I don't need someone to assume that for me.
> > It is easier for Apache to support both projects than to arbitrarily
> > choose between the two.
> 
> It wouldn't bother me at all for other projects to come here that are
> overlapping partially or completely that's not my point. My point is the
> incubator shouldn't be a source code limbo.
> 
> How did the decision come about that a complete path for incubation not
> be requisite as part of a proposal? Didn't the incubator start with
> Tapestry in which successful incubation meant the movement to a final
> destination?
> 
> So theoretically, given the current situation, any number of codebases
> could land here and sit indefinitely? That we are actually encouraging
> people to use Apache's incubator as an alternative to SourceForge?
> 
> > ....Roy
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jason@zenplex.com
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message