Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37458 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 03:46:12 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 03:46:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 72785 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2003 03:45:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72567 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2003 03:45:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72549 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 03:45:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 03:45:50 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.2.0-dev) with SMTP ID 558 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:45:58 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: [VOTE] Official Name for "Geronimo" Project Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:45:55 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3FCAB1A7.8080101@apache.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > 1) The incubator PMC is acquiring new PMC members, and will > asymptotically aproach the list of all ASF committers who > are involved in any way with any aspect of growth or > regeneration of code bases. In short, it will become the > epitame of an uber umbrella PMC. As you are aware, we are discussing a reorganization of the PMC that will change its structure to be tightly related to each project. > IMHO, the right answer is *not* to buck this up to the incubator PMC, or > to members, or *gasp* to the board. A much better approach would be: > 1) Have the incubator PMC identify a clear set of constraints that apply > to *all* names. Vote on them, document them, and move on. There is one, which has been documented from the beginning. There must be a trademark search to ensure that the name is available. As far as I can tell, that mandated activity never happened. I know that a search was done of the US PTO, but as I noted at the time, not all trademarks are registered. I've posted references to multiple software projects with a prior claim on the name, but the fact that there are multiple, and they haven't pursued each other might make it harder for them to complain about this one. IANAL, but I'm not sure, if Geronimo is even trademarkable for software. Sally makes a point that the Geronimo name has stuck, and should be kept. Roy made a comment that a condition for leaving the incubator is that the name be changed. I hadn't heard that before, but those are two incompatible views. > Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them > accountable for their decision. When we complete what I hope will be the Incubator's reorganization, and we have a Geronimo PPMC, I'm sure that will happen. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org