Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82927 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 09:11:49 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 09:11:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 75596 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2003 09:11:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75376 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2003 09:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75363 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 09:11:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smta00.mail.ozemail.net) (203.103.165.40) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 09:11:21 -0000 Received: from ozemail.com.au ([63.34.214.72]) by smta00.mail.ozemail.net with ESMTP id <20031113091058.OETM27143.smta00.mail.ozemail.net@ozemail.com.au> for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:10:58 +0000 Message-ID: <3FB34AC4.6080305@ozemail.com.au> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:11:32 +1100 From: Berin Lautenbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] Multiple Mentors References: <3FB21BD4.3060405@ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Berin Lautenbach wrote: > >> Nicola, >> >> I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable? >> The old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think the >> Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold people accountable for >> inubation activities. Gets harder with multiple people. > > > If the accountable person fails, what can we do? Nothing. > Replace them! That's what the board would do to a PMC chair for a PMC that was not delivering what the board requires. > Our goal is not to have one person accountable, as we are all > "accountable" as PMC members, but to have more eyes and hands working on > it that are also on our PMC. > Yes and no. (My favourite kind of answer.) As far as the board is concerned (which is where the PMC reports) - there *is* an accountable person. The chair of the PMC. That doesn't mean that the entire PMC doesn't get involved in any given issue though. As I think Noel said in a later e-mail, this is all a community process. So - I have no issue at all with having multiple mentors. Completely the opposite - I think it's a good thing. I'm just not sure it's worth making it overly official. A single "official" mentor with multiple helpers? As I said in the original post - it's only a slight reservation. I've just always found that if there is some single person who has official responsibility for something, it's generally more likely to happen. Cheers, Berin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org