Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88731 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 00:15:51 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2003 00:15:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 25946 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2003 00:15:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25875 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2003 00:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25855 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 00:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pproxy107.mbn.or.jp) (202.217.3.98) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2003 00:15:32 -0000 Received: from [202.217.47.70] (csh11-6.pas.mbn.or.jp [202.217.47.70]) by pproxy107.mbn.or.jp (8.11.7+Sun/pproxy107.mbn.or.jp-2.0) with ESMTP id h940Fb915438 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 09:15:37 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 09:20:37 +0900 From: Tetsuya Kitahata To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: technology sucks In-Reply-To: References: <20030923094646.A4C7.TETSUYA@apache.org> Message-Id: <20031004091640.FC37.TETSUYA@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.06.02 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:02:59 +0200 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I'm the moderator there, and I didn't see your mail. > I apologise for missing it, it was not intentional. Sorry. Okay, then can the config of the projects@incubator.apache.org be changed? When? Who? How? ---------------------------------------------------------- By the way, I think whether "intentional" or "not-intentional" would be a critical issue rampant in the ASF world. I think that the "diversity" in the ASF (e.g. difference between httpd/apr and jakarta) to a certain extent should be allowable and acceptable in a sense. (Also, AAMOC) However, the thing is worse, people were not willing to pass the stories down from generation to generation by the oral tradition. SO, the new comers can not distinguish whether XX is "intentional" or "not-intentional". ("not-intentional" can be interpreted as "from *ignorance* due to the lack of bequest to the others") # ezmlm config, PMC voting rules, .... hard to figure up all. As a result, the "different cultures" co-exist within the ASF, without the respects to each projects. (maybe) ---------------------------------------------------------- "A bad habit is easy to get into and hard to get rid of." =2E.. NICE *PROVERB* ... and please take it seriously Take care. -- Tetsuya. (tetsuya@apache.org) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org