Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>
> I'll answer that as best I can. Those that wish to follow along, may
> wish to refer to http://incubator.apache.org/process.html.
>
> Entry:
>
> * A group external to the foundation (IBM) wants to donate
> an existing code base to the Foundation. Additionally ,an
> existing (sub)project (Jakarta/Jetspeed) wants to incorporate
> this codebase and buid a community around it.
>
> Process:
>
> 1. All software in this codebase has had its copyright assigned to
> the ASF. The secretary of the ASF has acknowledged receipt of
> this copyright assignment.
>
> 2. All software in this codebase is now licensed under the Apache
> license. This license is present in every source file in cvs.
>
> * All contributors have faxed in Contributor License Agreements.
> The secretary has acknowledged receipt of these agreements.
>
> * The community has adopted the Apache voting rules and is otherwise
> following the Apache guidelines
>
> * The community is incorporated within the existing jakarta and
> jetspeed 'steering committees'.
>
> * The exit strategy for the podling has been defined as jakarta-pluto.
>
> 1. The Jakarta PMC has voted to accept this conditional upon
> successful incubation.
> 2. Time frame: TBD
> 3. Graduation requirements: TBD
>
> As to the two TBD's above, these depend on the definition of the
> incubation phases...
>
Thanks for the info, Sam.
I asked this mainly because of the wiki entry
(http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PlutoProposal)
where some people showed there interest in Pluto (or in the
proposal) and most of them are not aware of the current state.
And I was just wondering why this is the case.
Carsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|