Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71018 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 10:46:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 10:46:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 38799 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2003 10:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38586 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2003 10:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38573 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 10:46:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 10:46:29 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3vXw-0008Lf-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: general@incubator.apache.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3vXv-0008LV-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:27 +0200 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3vXv-0002vL-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:27 +0200 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: Re: Question time ! Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:44:01 +0200 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <3F77A7D5.1030500@apache.org> Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030923 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <3F77A7D5.1030500@apache.org> Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stephen McConnell wrote: > Why are we discussing/considering the possibility of anything other than > a TLP incubation? If a project is comming in as part of another project > than an existing PMC is bringing it it in and doing so in accordance > with the policies, procedures and due-diligence that have been granted > under their respective charters. We may well be making a wopping big > blunder here in that much of what we are discussing undermines the > responsibilities already discharged to existing PMCs. > Instead, I propose that we re-focus our attention to role of the > Incubator PMC as the adjunct to the board in dealing with new TLP > candidates. Read this [1] and you will have all the answers. [1] http://incubator.apache.org/resolution.html -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org