Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42237 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 22:02:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 22:02:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 12996 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2003 22:02:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12956 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2003 22:02:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12930 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 22:02:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com) (24.93.67.83) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 22:02:16 -0000 Received: from noel770 (cae88-16-024.sc.rr.com [24.88.16.24]) by ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h8ILwZpM002718 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:58:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] PMC Vote to incubate Directory Project Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:01:52 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3F6A1DF7.7060402@apache.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sam Ruby wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Jakarta has too much on its plate and should probably be closed to new > > projects until more of the existing ones are promoted to TLP status, > > so I'd suggest DB, instead. But it ought not come to that, given the > > Board's TLP directive. > Embedded in that first sentence is a statement that I think is a bit too > strong, IMHO. Perhaps, but if so, not by much (I didn't say IMO, because I think that this whole discussion is one of personal opinion). And I am not anti-Jakarta. It just seems encumbered by size. > Jakarta's growth rate has slowed down to a near stop. Cause or effect? :-) > I would support JetSpeed+Pluto+WSRP4J+possibly others > eventually becoming [a TLP]. Agreed. Other candidates that have been suggested by one person or another include: Turbine Velocity Lucene (or to db.apache.org?) Struts separately or in some semantically related combination. Lucene, for example, doesn't get nearly the "mindshare" that it ought. > One thing that should be abundantly clear is that every Jakarta code > base that has desired to become a top level project has had the full > support of the Jakarta PMC in achieving this goal. I don't doubt it, and the proof ought to be in the ones that have already done so. I do ask if the PMC doing anything to help encourage other projects to matriculate? I must stress that is a question, not a backhanded comment. I really have no idea. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org