Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84428 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 19:40:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 19:40:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 42350 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2003 19:40:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42103 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2003 19:40:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42090 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 19:40:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com) (24.93.67.84) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 19:40:39 -0000 Received: from noel770 (cae88-16-024.sc.rr.com [24.88.16.24]) by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h8IJcV4R005999 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:38:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] PMC Vote to incubate Directory Project Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:40:13 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <870B1B39-EA09-11D7-8876-000393D76AB8@jagunet.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jim Jagielski wrote: > Without a clear sense of responsibility, the end result > are that podlings are essentially left on their own and > "every" Incubator member thinks someone else is > doing the oversight. :/ I really thought that I had provided a clearer picture than that. Who has the "clear sense of responsibility" for each TLP on the ASF Board? My view, or proposal if you will, seems analogous. For each podling, there shall exist an ASF Member acting as shephard. That ASF Member shall work with, and report to, the Incubator PMC specifically in support of that podling's oversight. Does that not provide a clear sense of responsibility? It is certainly a lot more scalable, and the ASF Member sponsoring the podling ought to be familar with the project domain, which is more than you can fairly ask of an arbitrary PMC member. This also fits in with what Ted just said. He is shepharding XMLBeans on behalf of the XML PMC. They are, I hope, acting as an involved parent, not just delegating to the Incubator PMC. So Ted ought to be working with the Incubator PMC to ensure that the latter is kept in the loop and involved. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org