Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87495 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 16:48:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 16:48:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 21092 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2003 16:48:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21056 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2003 16:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21026 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 16:48:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.sauria.com) (64.38.174.106) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 16:48:05 -0000 Received: from sauria.com (boo.sauria.com [192.168.0.10]) by mail.sauria.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AB9BF3A for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3F707948.1080803@sauria.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:48:08 -0700 From: Ted Leung User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Another cut at roles and responsibilities References: <20030923012643.OPXA22174.mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au@[127.0.0.1]> <3F6FB71B.5010304@apache.org> <3F702ACC.3070903@ozemail.com.au> <3F703C92.3010505@ozemail.com.au> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.81.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/23/2003 5:31 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > There is only one point that I have different in my mind and that is > IIUC addressed there. > > It's about having an "elder" shepherd mentoring the main shepherd, and > possibly requiring at least two people helping in Incubation. > I think that there are situations where having an "elder" shepherd may be useful, but I would make it optional rather than mandatory. Remember that shepherds are ASF Officers or ASF Members here. These folks are supposed to have a clue about the ethos of the ASF. Once we have a clear checklist of entry and exit criteria, I think that people will be able to find their way. JMHO. Ted --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org