Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96235 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2003 12:14:23 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2003 12:14:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9325 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2003 12:14:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9241 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2003 12:14:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9220 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2003 12:14:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2003 12:14:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 13355 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2003 12:14:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (stefano@80.105.91.155) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2003 12:14:15 -0000 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:14:14 +0200 Subject: Re: ASF member role - accountable to whom Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Stefano Mazzocchi To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20030921130919.8E5B.TETSUYA@apache.org> Message-Id: <1DBBBA44-EC2D-11D7-B98A-000393D2CB02@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sunday, Sep 21, 2003, at 06:15 Europe/Rome, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:25:53 -0400 > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > >> Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: >>> >>> "Meritocracy"? >> yes, meritocracy. the entire asf is a meritocracy, as is each >> project within it. > > I see. but here's one question. Does this "meritocracy" > encourage the inactive *ASF members* into the retirement status > or hibernation status? it would, if the ASF members had consensus on what "inactive" means, or how to encourage without offending. > Also, I assume that all the ASF members have signed the "new" CLA > as a matter of course ... is this true? ??? what is the 'new' CLA? >>> Here is a gooooood stats on this (general@incubator) mailing list. >> : >>> Hope this helps :-) >> not really, at least not for me, since i don't know what point >> you're trying to make.. > > Eheh, > > I should have put that on the threads of > "[VOTE] dims for incubator PMC" > or > "[VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)" > ... :-) > > Also, I will make use of this stats in > "Please make me a committer of Incubator Project: incubator-site" > campaign :-) I admit I'm lost as much as Ken on this. What the hell are you talking about? can't you be more explicit, please? -- Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org