From general-return-2148-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Sep 26 07:03:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43776 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 07:03:18 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 07:03:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 89403 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2003 07:02:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89336 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2003 07:02:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89323 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 07:02:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.noos.fr) (212.198.2.74) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 07:02:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 55880197 invoked by uid 0); 26 Sep 2003 07:03:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) ([212.198.17.4]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.74 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Sep 2003 07:03:03 -0000 Message-ID: <3F73E548.6060100@apache.org> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:05:44 +0200 From: Stephen McConnell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Exit Criteria References: <20030926065323.ZNLP22174.mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au@[127.0.0.1]> In-Reply-To: <20030926065323.ZNLP22174.mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au@[127.0.0.1]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Lautenbach wrote: >So what's the final verdict on releases? > I'm wondering about this myself. My own theory is that this entire discussion is exceeding the bounds of duristiction of the Incubator PMC. I.e. IMVVHO if the incubated project wants to publish an artifact it needs to do one of two things: (a) publish under a non-ASF license, or (b) exit the incubator one way or another, and if arriving in Apache, then initiate publishing under an appropriate (non-Incubator) PMC directive, or, its not in Apache and its not our problem Does the Incubator PMC have an formal opinion on this subject? Stephen. -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:mcconnell@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org