From general-return-2051-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Sep 23 11:18:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79195 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 11:18:48 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 11:18:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 76670 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2003 11:18:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76581 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2003 11:18:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76467 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 11:18:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be) (157.193.121.51) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 11:18:41 -0000 Received: from outerthought.org (host115 [192.168.123.115]) by otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8NBIfX13995 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:18:41 +0200 Message-ID: <3F702C13.5000904@outerthought.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:18:43 +0200 From: Steven Noels Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030916 Thunderbird/0.3a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Exit Criteria References: <3F6F4741.4040705@sauria.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >> Engagement by the XMLbeans community with the XML PMC and other ASF >> sub communities, particularly infrastructure@ (this reflects my >> personal bias that projects should pay an infrastructure "tax"). >> Incubator PMC has voted for graduation >> XML PMC has voted for final acceptance > > > Not needed. XML PMC already accepted it, we cannot have the case in > which the Incubator says ok, and then the XML one does not. As a sponsor > that has voted for incubation there is no reason why they have to vote > again. (nothing to do with the infrastructure tax:) Do I read you correct in saying that the receiving PMC has no chance anymore to declare an incubation failed, if the Incubator PMC says the contrary? In that case (and I hope I'm wrong), why is the receiving PMC involved then? -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org