From general-return-1983-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Sep 22 12:49:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83489 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2003 12:49:56 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2003 12:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 58051 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2003 12:49:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58012 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2003 12:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57999 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2003 12:49:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Boron.MeepZor.Com) (204.146.167.214) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2003 12:49:51 -0000 Received: from Golux.Com (dsl093-240-231.ral1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.240.231]) (authenticated) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8MCnql30481; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:49:52 -0400 Message-ID: <3F6EEFCA.1020109@Golux.Com> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:49:14 -0400 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting the distribution onto a download site somewhere ... References: <3F6E9C9D.7020105@ispsoft.de> In-Reply-To: <3F6E9C9D.7020105@ispsoft.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > Thanks, understood. In that case, I'd hold my argument, that the incubated > project requires the ability for Releases in order to attract external users > and build a community. i disagree. the lack of a release snapshot doesn't seem to interfere with sourceforge projects attracting people, and i don't see that it would be any different here. i think the point is that a podling is *not* part of the asf, and is therefore not entitled to distribute something with the asf's name on it. if the podling graduates, i don't see any bar to whatever packages were built during incubation being retitled as asf ones. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org