From general-return-2147-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Sep 26 06:53:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37590 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 06:53:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 06:53:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 70336 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2003 06:53:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70196 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2003 06:53:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70183 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 06:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au) (203.2.192.87) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 06:53:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au with SMTP id <20030926065323.ZNLP22174.mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:53:23 +1000 From: Berin Lautenbach To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: Exit Criteria Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:53:23 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20030926065323.ZNLP22174.mta06.mail.mel.aone.net.au@[127.0.0.1]> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola, Apologies - I've lost the plot a bit on this one :<. So what's the final verdict on releases? Cheers, Berin > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi > Subject: Re: Exit Criteria > Date: 26/09/2003 16:23:36 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Erik Abele wrote: > ... > > ...but the last part about restricting mirror usage seems a bit > > strong to me. IMO the 'Incubatee' should be encouraged and trained to > > use our mirroring system appropriately. > > In fact this document, coupled with "at least a couple of releases to > exit", is at least wierd, as Ted has duly noted. > > > If the release is clearly marked as being incubated and it's a public > > release (for a definition see apache.org/dev/mirrors.html), I don't > > see any issues in permitting the podling to use the mirrors. > > > > The only downside of which I can think of at the moment is if > > incubation fails and the project vanishes (?, at least from the ASF), > > the mirrored releases would be kept on archives.apache.org. We'd then > > have to manually remove them or perhaps we could just keep them there > > as a part of our history. > > If they can release as incubated projects, I'd say that keeping them as > history is quite logical. > > > hmm, I'm wondering if a apache.org/dist/incubator/ directory would do > > any good here? > > After some thought, I now tend to favor this and agree with what you > say. +1 > > BTW, I still believe that keeping all incubated projects under the > incubator, with @incubator ML and incubator-cvs is the most correct and > consistent thing to do, especially now that with this setting we would > have lenya@cocoon releasing as incubator-lenya... hmmm > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org